Main Article Content

Abstract

Shear walls in high-rise buildings enhance resistance against lateral loads. This study compares the performance of four different
shear wall configurations in an eight-stories building designed with a dual structural system using the Response Spectrum
method, including structural period, shear force, story drift, and cost. Four shear wall configurations are planned: (1) Existing
Condition with Core Wall shear walls on the right and left sides (SW0); (2) Frame Wall in an L shape around the lift and stairs
(SW1); (3) Two L shapes around the lift and stairs and two I shapes on the facade (SW2); and (4) I shapes around the lift, stairs,
and facade (SW3). Simulations were conducted using ETABS, considering dead loads, live loads, and earthquake loads. Cost
estimate for shear walls of each alternative. Based on Structural Performance analysis Shear wall alternatives 2 (SW2) performs
best compared to others models. Based on the Cost Comparison SW0 is the cheapest among other configurations, however,
from the structural performance perspective, SW2 & SW3 perform much better than those in SW0.

Keywords

Shear Wall Dual System Structural Performance Cost Etimate

Article Details

References

  1. M. M. A. Pratama, S. D. S. Putri, and E. Santoso, “Analisis
  2. Kinerja Bangunan Gedung Tinggi Dengan Penambahan
  3. Dinding Geser (Studi Kasus: Bangunan 8 Lantai),” Siklus :
  4. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 119–130, Sep. 2021,
  5. doi: 10.31849/siklus.v7i2.6922.
  6. SNI 1726:2019, “Badan Standarisasi Nasional Indonesia
  7. (2019) ’SNI 1726:2019 tentang Tata Cara Perencanaan
  8. Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan
  9. Non Gedung,” 2019.
  10. N. R. Pramesti, S. I. Ditulis, U. Memenuhi, S. Persyaratan,
  11. D. Memperoleh, and G. Sarjana, “ANALISA PERILAKU
  12. BANGUNAN TIDAK BERATURAN HORIZONTAL
  13. DENGAN VARIASI DIMENSI KOLOM TERHADAP
  14. GEMPA,” 2018.
  15. F. Erwinsyah, R. Windah, S. O. Dapas, and S. E. Wallah,
  16. “PERHITUNGAN GAYA GESER PADA BANGUNAN
  17. BERTINGKAT YANG BERDIRI DI ATAS TANAH
  18. MIRING AKIBAT GEMPA DENGAN CARA DINAMIS,”
  19. S. J. Akbar and Y. Candra, “ANALISA NILAI
  20. SIMPANGAN HORIZONTAL (DRIFT) PADA
  21. STRUKTUR TAHAN GEMPA MENGGUNAKAN
  22. SISTEM RANGKA BRESING EKSENTRIK TYPE
  23. BRACED V,” Teras Jurnal, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 301, Mar. 2018,
  24. doi: 10.29103/tj.v7i2.139.
  25. D. Jumas, M. Dwiitra Jumas, and lahir di Pariaman,
  26. “MODEL ESTIMASI BIAYA PADA BANGUNAN
  27. GEDUNG,” 2020.
  28. SNI 1727:2020, “Badan Standarisasi Nasional Indonesia
  29. (2020) ‘SNI 1727:2020 tentang Beban desain minimum dan
  30. kriteria terkait untuk bangunan gedung dan struktur lain.,’”
  31. SNI 2847:2019, “Badan Standarisasi Nasional Indonesia
  32. (2019) ‘SNI 2847:2019 tentang Persyaratan beton struktural
  33. untuk bangunan Gedung, dan penjelasan.,’” 2019.